Best features
- Pricing
- Standard features
- Comfort
- Ride
For the CLK it has usually been a case of always the bridesmaid but never the bride. It has been close for the past three years, but not close enough to grab glory. However, with the departure of last year’s champ, the Audi S4, and the arrival of a more purposeful engine, this consummate all-rounder has seized its chance.
Don’t for a minute imagine it has the brawn, brakes or balance to match the true hustlers of the class, BMW’s M3 or the Porsche Boxster. Instead, visualise a classy and capable coupe that has a signifi cant portion of the other contenders’ desirable dynamics with fewer flaws.
CLK’s considerable price tag brings significant savings over other top types, while its fiscal advantage strengthens with lower ongoing outlays, depreciation costs and fuel consumption. Mercedes also backs its product with a healthier warranty than the other German brands and includes a seductive list of standards.
This category’s weightings indicate that design and functionality are valued even more than outstanding on-road attributes. And again the star brand’s prodigy pushes the envelope. Its seats appeal to a broader audience courtesy of their superior shape and comfort, accessibility to the rear seat is simple, and the four-seater’s design offers handy room for passengers and cargo.
Along with its German associates, the Benz build quality is exceptional. Points of difference over its rivals include fewer emissions and a full-sized spare wheel.
CLK owners gain user-friendly controls and underlying levels of safety. They’ll also gain a car with exceptional ride and smoothness/quietness. The new 3.5-litre engine and seven-speed auto is a welcome addition for enthusiasts.
But the M3 and Boxster possess the noblest of sporting lineages. This Teutonic duo propels dynamic abilities to new levels. We cannot split their on-road scores. It is a treat to turn the steering wheel in either example.
Much of the blame for their minor placings relates to value, with two-year warranties and depreciation costs among their weaknesses. But they also dip in practicality, environment and space. |